STUDY
ON THE STRATEGIES OF SEMARANG CONTAINER TERMINAL
IN FACING ASEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY 2015
Arina Narulitasari, Paniya,
Erika Devie
Business Administration Department, Semarang State Polytechnic
ABSTRACT
At the 12th ASEAN Summit, the leader of ASEAN members agree to accelerate the establishment of
ASEAN Community in 2015 and transform ASEAN region with free flow of goods;
free flow of services; free flow of investment; free flow of skilled labor; and
free flow of capital. The role of port of port is crucial in economy
development, the presence of capability port plays major role in supporting
people and goods mobility especially the presence of AEC whose element is free
flow of goods in ASEAN countries. To face AEC, people of Indonesia generally
and Central Java especially need some strategies that they might not be a
spectator in their own country.
This undergraduate thesis uses qualitative method to describe the
strategies of Semarang Container Terminal in facing AEC and analyzed it by SWOT
Analysis, SWOT diagram, and SWOT matrix. The result of IFAS is 3.6 and EFAS is
3.48, so that the position of Semarang Container Terminal is in quadrant 1,
supporting aggressive strategy. The aggressive strategies are maximizing the
use of the existing facilities to increase company’s performance, reprogram
Road Show, and do socialization to stakeholder in cooperation with Central Java
and Yogyakarta government (SO Strategy in SWOT matrix).
Key words: strategy, Semarang Container Terminal, ASEAN Economic Community, strength,
opportunity.
INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study
Each country in this world has difference geography,
different climate, different science and technology comprehension, and
different needs that a country cannot fulfill, the availability of certain raw
materials in a place that are unavailable in another place allow them to have
superior product. Based on that reason, international trade or export-import is
conducted to fulfill a country needs. Not only that, the function of
international trade is to decrease the impact of domestic sales and it may
affect the economic growth that is one of economic progress indicator in a
country. The economic progress can be evidenced by high level of per capita
income of a country, the higher per capita income in a country the more
prosperous the country is.
In export-import activity of goods to fulfill the needs of a
country, goods which are exported or imported can be sent by three differences
mean of transportation at is lane, air lane (by plane), land lane (by truck,
car, or rail transportation), and sea lane (by ship which is owned by shipping
company). The three of transportation mode has its own plus and minus point,
but in export and import activity importers and exporters prefer to use ship to
send their goods, the benefits of using ship in export-import activity
according to Hariyani and Serfianto
(2010:88), export-import activity by using ship as the transportation has some
benefits such as the cost is cheap, ship can load many goods, there are kind of
ship which load a container, dry container and reefer container that could save
the goods safely and keep the goods from decomposition of frozen foods such as
meat, vegetable, milk, etc. Other types of ship are break bulk and tanker. The
break bulk ship could save goods in bulk, whereas tanker could save liquid
goods such as oil. Meanwhile the disadvantage using ship in export-import
activity is the goods need more time to deliver from loaded port to destiny
port.
At the ASEAN
Summit in Bali in October 2003, the ASEAN leaders declare that the AEC (ASEAN
Economic Community) has the goal of regional economic integration in 2020, but
at the 12st ASEAN Summit they agree to accelerate the
establishment of ASEAN Community in 2015 and transform ASEAN region with free
flow of goods; services; investment; skilled labor; and free flow of capital.
Indonesia is the largest archipelago which consist of 70% of water and 30% of
land and as a maritime country, the role of port is crucial in economy
development, the presence of capability port plays major role in supporting
people and goods mobility especially the presence of AEC whose element is free
flow of goods in ASEAN countries, because loaded-unloaded company should have
some strategies in facing ASEAN Economic Community 2015. So, based on that
background I’m motivated to write a thesis entitled “Study on the Strategies of
Semarang Container Terminal in Facing ASEAN Economic Community 2015”.
Objectives of the Study
The objectives
of the study are to find out:
a.
Internal and
external variable in Semarang Container Terminal. The internal variable
consists of strength and weakness of the company, meanwhile the external
variable consists of opportunity and threat.
b.
Suitable
strategy to face ASEAN Economic Community that would be hold at the end of
2015.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Strategy
According to
Solihin (2012:64), “Strategy is determination of long term goals of an
enterprise and the adoption of courses of action and the allocation necessary
of sources to carry out these goals.” According to Andrew in Manajemen Strategik Dalam Organisasi (lited
in Kurniawan and Hamdani, 2008:11) “Strategy is an effort to evaluate the
strength and weakness of company compared to opportunity and threat in the
environment faced.” According to
Ohmae in Manajemen Strategik Dalam
Organisasi (lited in Kurniawan and Hamdani, 2008:11) “Strategy is a
competitive advantage in order to change company’s strength to be comparable,
or exceed the competitor’s strength through the most efficient way.”
Based on the above
definitions, strategy is concluded as long term goal a company made for getting
certain purpose by most efficient way in order to make a company better than
the competitors.
Container Terminal
According to Suyono
(2003:1) “Container terminal is a terminal that is equipped at least the lack
of facilities such as moorings, docks, container yard, and also proper
equipment to serve the activities of loading and unloading of containers.” According
to P.T. Pelindo in Port Reference (2009:81), “Container terminal is a place for
loading-unloading activity.”
Based on those
definitions, container terminal is a place provides some facilities for
loading-unloading activity with special packing by using containers.
Facilities in Container Terminal
According to Triatmodjo
(2010:331) some facilities in container terminal are quay, apron, container
yard, container freight station, monitoring tower, maintenance workshop, and
other facilities such as entranceway, office building, and parking area.
Container Terminal Equipments
To support
container loading-unloading activity as a general rule a container terminal has
some equipment as follow:
1. Quayside Gantry Crane or Container Crane
(CC).
According to Triatmodjo (2010:312) “Container Crane is an
equipment for loading-unloading has long sleeves are placed over the port.”
2. Transtainer.
Lasse (2012:34) stated that “Transtainer is a land crane
served container transfer activity for quay operation transfer nor receipt or
delivery operation.”
3. Straddle Carrier.
Triatmodjo stated, “Stradle carrier is an equipment for
container stacking in two or three tier, the function of stradle carrier almost
same with RTG.”
4. Forklift Truck.
Forklift truck is an equipment for staffing and unstaffing
activity.
5. Reach Stacker or Super Stacker.
Reach stacker is an equipment for stucking and unstucking
activity in container yard, it is combination of lift truck and mobile crane.
6. Side Loader.
Side loader is an equipment to lift on and lift off a
container from side of container.
7. Top Loader.
According to Lasse (2012:38) “Top loader is a lift up
equipment used for lift on and lift off service.”
8. Terminal Tractor Trailer (Head Truck and
Chassis).
Terminal tractor trailer used in Indonesia generally called
head truck-chassis, head truck completed by chassis (an equipment used to lay
container) used to transportation in haulage activity.
ASEAN Economic Community
The definition of
ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) based on bemfebunivtelkom.wordpress.com is a
form of trade and economic cooperation in ASEAN region (including Indonesia) in
the form of an agreement to create a balanced and fair trade situation through
the reduction of tariff on goods trade where there are no tariffs (customs
duties) and non-tariff barriers ASEAN member countries.
SWOT Analysis
Rangkuti (2014:19) stated “SWOT analysis is
identification multiple factors systematically to formulate company’s
strategy.”
RESEARCH METHOD
Sample and Population
The population
in this research is five divisions in Semarang Container Terminal’s staff in five divisions: HRD
Division, Information Management System Division, Financial Division,
Operational Division, and Technique Division. Meanwhile, the sample of this
research (purposive sampling) are 12 staffs in Operational Division.
Technique of
Collecting Data
1.
Interview.
The definition of interview according to Sanusi (2014:105),
“Interview is technique collecting data using question as spoken to research
subject.”
2.
Observation.
According to Ghony and Almanshur (2012:165), “Observation is
a technique of collecting data that require the researcher to observe the
related things.”
3.
Questioner.
According to Soeratno and Arsyad (1995:96),
“Questioner is a technic of collecting data by providing question list to
respondent.”
Technic of Analysis.
In this
undergraduate thesis, the writer uses SWOT analysis to identify the strengths,
weakness, opportunities, and threats by SWOT or TOWS matrix and also analyze
the company position in SWOT diagram.
Finding
Based on primary
data processed, the IFAS and EFAS table are as Table 1 and Table 2.
Table 1
IFAS (Internal Strategic Factors Analysis
Summary)
|
Strengths
|
Weight
|
Rating
|
Score
|
|
|
1.
|
Semarang
Container Terminal is expanding a quay as many 105 meters.
|
0.08
|
3.6
|
0.3
|
|
2.
|
Semarang Container Terminal is expanding
a Container Yard (CY) as many 5.3 hectares.
|
0.08
|
3.7
|
0.3
|
|
3.
|
Procurement 10 units of head truck and
chassis.
|
0.08
|
3.6
|
0.3
|
|
4.
|
Implementing new container application.
|
0.08
|
3.6
|
0.3
|
|
5.
|
Adding two units of CC.
|
0.09
|
4
|
0.4
|
|
6.
|
Adding eleven units of A-RTG.
|
0.08
|
3.3
|
0.3
|
|
7.
|
Semarang Container Terminal is a
container terminal in Central Java served domestic and international route.
|
0.07
|
3.3
|
0.2
|
|
8.
|
Online job order.
|
0.08
|
3.3
|
0.3
|
|
Total of strengths
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
Weaknesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
The absence of
similar competitor in Central Java.
|
0.06
|
2.7
|
0.2
|
|
2.
|
Semarang
Container Terminal does not have yet its electricity power plant.
|
0.07
|
3.3
|
0.2
|
|
3.
|
Semarang
Container Terminal does not have yet more generator set.
|
0.08
|
4
|
0.3
|
|
4.
|
Semarang
Container Terminal does apply yet utilizing “green” technology.
|
0.07
|
2.3
|
0.2
|
|
5.
|
Low motivation in
mastery of English for Semarang Container Terminal’s staffs.
|
0.08
|
3.3
|
0.3
|
|
Total of weaknesses
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
Total of IFAS
|
1
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
Total
of strengths – total of weaknesses
2.40-1.20 = 1.2 (x)
|
||||
Source: primary
data processed
Table 2
EFAS (External Strategic Factor Analysis
Summary)
|
Opportunities
|
Weight
|
Rating
|
Score
|
|
|
1.
|
The promotion of
SME sector export potential will grow market share through the sea.
|
0.1
|
3.4
|
0.34
|
|
2.
|
The propensity
changing pattern of carriage from bulk to container.
|
0.1
|
3.3
|
0.33
|
|
3.
|
The simplification of COO Form D.
|
0.1
|
3.8
|
0.38
|
|
4.
|
“Road Show”
program held by Semarang Container Terminal.
|
0.1
|
4
|
0.4
|
|
5.
|
Hinterland area
in Central Java and Yogyakarta.
|
0.1
|
4
|
0.4
|
|
Total of opportunities
|
|
|
1.85
|
|
|
Threats
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
The depth of pool and channel of port -10 LWS.
|
0.1
|
3.3
|
0.33
|
|
2.
|
Illegal keramba
owned by fishermen.
|
0.1
|
3.3
|
0.33
|
|
3.
|
Some of related institutions and importers do not operate
24 hours, 7 days.
|
0.1
|
3.2
|
0.32
|
|
4.
|
Land lowering and rob impact.
|
0.1
|
3.4
|
0.34
|
|
5.
|
Impact of UU No. 17 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pelayaran (Constitution
No. 17 Year 2008 About Shipping).
|
0.1
|
3.1
|
0.31
|
|
Total of
threats
|
|
|
1.63
|
|
|
Total of EFAS
|
1
|
|
3.48
|
|
|
Total
of opportunities – total of threats
1.85-1.63 = 0.22 (y)
|
||||
Source: primary
data processed
Based on IFAS and EFAS tables (Table 1 and Table 2), resulted
the position of Semarang Container Terminal in quadrant 1, supporting the aggressive strategy. The SWOT diagram
is as Diagram 1.

According to
position of Semarang Container Terminal in quadrant 1, so that the strategy
selected is SO strategy, namely utilize the strengths to catch the existing
opportunities. The SO strategies are:
1. Maximizing the use of the existing facilities to increase company’s
performance.
2. Reprogram Road Show.
3. Do socialization to stakeholder in cooperation with Central Java and
Yogyakarta government.
The ST strategies are:
1. Coordinating with Tanjung Emas Branch
related to the depth of port pool and shipping channel.
2. Coordinating with KSOP and Tanjung Emas Branch related to Port Master Plan or RIP socialization and Semarang Container
Terminal development to people who lives around the port.
3. Coordinating with related institution to
support the operating system 24 hours online.
The WO strategy is:
1. Efficient the generator set’s capacity and
coordinate with P.T. PLN concerning the reliability of electric supply from
P.T. PLN.
The WT strategies
are:
1. Increasing the number of genset in order to
maximize the using of loading-unloading equipments.
2. Coordinating to trucking company and Organda (Organisasi Angkatan Darat or Land
Transportation Organization)
concerning the age limit of trailer which may enter Semarang Container Terminal
area.
CONCLUSION
According to the
results of the discussion it can be concluded as follows:
a. Total IFAS (Internal Factor Evaluation) is
3.6 meanwhile the total EFAS (External Factor Evaluation) is 3.48.
b. The result in SWOT diagram, Semarang
Container Terminal is in quadrant 1 namely supporting aggressive strategy.
REFERENCES
Ghony, M. Djunaidi
dan Fauzan Almanshur. 2012. Metode
Penelitian Kualitatif. Jogjakarta: AR-RUZZ MEDIA.
Hariyani, Iswi dan
R. Serfianto. 2010. Panduan Ekspor Impor:
Saatnya Bisnis Anda “Naik Kelas”!. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Yustisia.
https://bemfebunivtelkom.wordpress.com/2014/09/19/apa-itu-aec-kajian-kastratfeb_utel/
accessed on 11 May
2015
Kurniawan, Fitri
Lukiastuti. 2008. Manajemen Strategik
dalam Organisasi. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo.
Lasse, D.A.. 2012. Manajemen Peralatan Aspek Operasional dan
Perawatan. Jakarta: P.T. Raja Grafindo Persada.
PT. Pelabuhan
Indonesia. 2009. Referensi Kepelabuhanan:
Perencanaan, Perancangan, dan Pembangunan Pelabuhan.
Rangkuti, Freddy.
2014. Analisis SWOT: Teknik Membedah
Kasus Bisnis Cara Perhitungan Bobot, Rating, dan OCAI. Jakarta: Gramedia
Pustaka Utama.
Sanusi, Anwar.
2014. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis.
Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Soeratno and
Lincolin Arsyad. 1995. Metodologi
Penelitian untuk Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.
Solihin, Ismail.
2012. Manajemen Strategik. Jakarta:
Erlangga.
Suyono, Capt. R.P..
2003. Shipping, Pengangkutan Intermodal
Ekspor Impor Melalui Laut. Jakarta: PPM.
Triatmodjo,
Bambang. 2010. Perencanaan Pelabuhan.
Yogyakarta: Beta Offset Yogyakarta.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar